Kaduna Election Tribunal Admits All Exhibits By PDP Candidate, Ashiru

The lead Counsel to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate in the 2023 Kaduna State Governorship election, Oluwole Iyamu (SAN), has said that the respondents’ Counsels failed to show up to inspect the exhibits tendered by the PDP candidate, Hon. Isa Ashiru and his party as ordered by the Kaduna State Governor Election Tribunal.

Upon hearing the arguments on Tuesday, the three-man panel admitted the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)’s Forms EC8A, EC8B, EC8C, EC8D, EC8E, and EC40G series from various polling units and Local Government Areas of the state, which were tendered by the PDP and its candidate, as exhibits.

The submitted exhibits are from Giwa, Chikun, Igabi, Kachia, Kaduna North, Kaduna South, Kagarko, Kubau, Kudan, Lere, Sabon-Gari, and Zaria respectively.

Earlier, the counsel to the 1st (INEC), 2nd (Uba Sani), and 3rd (APC) respondents, argued that the petitioner’s counsel had breached the court order, which instructed that all parties (counsels) should meet for the uptaking of the exhibits before the presentation.

In his argument, the counsel to the 3rd respondent, Muhammad Sani Katu, SAN, who sought adjournment of the case, explained that the order of the court was that all counsels must meet for sorting and marking of the exhibits for orderliness.

“We cannot proceed as it stands. This is because the order is not been complied with,” Katu argued.

In his defence, the lead counsel to both the PDP and Ashiru, Oluwole Iyamu objected, explaining that they (the counsels to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd respondents) were given the opportunity for sorting, marking, and studying the said exhibits before today’s sitting but failed to show up as ordered by the court.

“The court registrar can attest to the fact that the 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents’ counsels were given the opportunity, and several efforts were made for them to come for the sorting and marking of the exhibits but, they declined,” he added.

Upon considering the submissions of the counsels, the court ruled that all exhibits be submitted to the court by the petitioner’s counsel.

Also, Iyamu further told the court that more documents were expected from the INEC, which according to him, are part of the exhibits to be tendered.